The issue: a bunch of folks have been building from various perspectives, backgrounds, and experiences. There could be potential discoveries and concepts that are in the blind spot of the core team.
A possible solution: A jury pool that includes at least 1 high level dev and other volunteers could audit projects and then…; 1. point out design flaws 2. share knowledge like planned upgrades that will affect a project/ecosystem 3. help builders who are stuck 4. develop a community of knowledgeable builders… Plus (I think most important) learn of any novel ideas/tools/workflows that should shape the standards being discussed currently. Concurrently, the non-high level devs on the jury would learn in the intimate setting of a project audit. Rising seas raise all ships and in this case it’s vital IMO as more knowledgeable ambassadors = more onboarding = more ambassadors = more onboarding…